🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any use of the funds as theft. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."